Stader Look-up Request: SCHMID(T)
Erin Kampf
Hello!
I was wondering if anyone may be able to check for this family in the appropriate Stader book: Johannes and Barbara SCHMIDT
|
|
Philipp Gerhardt
Although "Johannes SCHMIDT" was probably one of the most common names at that time, there was no Johannes SCHMIDT in Heufeld in 1777. Who should that be? A little more information would be helpful. Philipp
-----Original-Nachricht----- Betreff: [banat] Stader Look-up Request: SCHMID(T) Datum: 2021-02-07T02:28:43+0100 Von: "Erin Kampf" <erin.kampf@...> An: "everybody@banat.groups.io" <everybody@banat.groups.io>
Hello! I was wondering if anyone may be able to check for this family in the appropriate Stader book: Johannes and Barbara SCHMIDT
|
|
Erin Kampf
Hi Philipp,
Thanks for the reply. Unfortunately I don't have any more information. I found this couple noted in the Allocation of House Numbers (Zuteilung der Hausnummern) for Heufeld. They are the first listed for House 42 (although Johann is crossed out and I cannot read what is written above). My ancestor Sebastian SCHMIDT is listed second, so I am guessing these may be his parents, or at least probably related in some way. See attached for the record in question. Would appreciate any insight you or others may have. Best regards, Erin
|
|
Anna Lorenz
Hi Erin,
I read Fridrich Schmidt over the crossed out Johann and his wife Barbara
Anni
Gesendet: Sonntag, 07. Februar 2021 um 18:28 Uhr
Von: "Erin Kampf" <erin.kampf@...> An: everybody@banat.groups.io Betreff: Re: [banat] Stader Look-up Request: SCHMID(T) Hi Philipp,
Thanks for the reply. Unfortunately I don't have any more information. I found this couple noted in the Allocation of House Numbers (Zuteilung der Hausnummern) for Heufeld. They are the first listed for House 42 (although Johann is crossed out and I cannot read what is written above). My ancestor Sebastian SCHMIDT is listed second, so I am guessing these may be his parents, or at least probably related in some way. See attached for the record in question. Would appreciate any insight you or others may have. Best regards, Erin
|
|
And if you would like to see a map of the Village of Heufeld, here is a link:
https://www.danube-swabians.org/HeufledMap.htm -- David Preston Banat List Admin
|
|
Erin Kampf
@Anni - Yes, it certainly could be. Very difficult for me to decipher. Do you know what it says after his name and before "et Barbara uxor"?
@David - Thanks for the map. Very interesting. I have not seen that before. I must come by my love of wine honestly - so many vineyards ;)
|
|
Philipp Gerhardt
Namen des Besitzers Überkommungs-Art [kind of transfer of the ground] --- Fridrich SCHMIDT ein Bauer Durch die erste ordentliche 22 October 1777 et Barbara uxor Grundes-Eintheillung [by the first land allotment] --- Sebastian SCHMIDT ein Bauer Durch Übergabe-Kontrakt[??] 2 May 1798 und Rosina dessen Eheweib von seinem Vater [by transfer contract from his father] ---- So this shows that Friedrich SCHMIDT and Barbara were the parents of your ancestor Sebastian SCHMIDT. Friedrich SCHMIDT is Stader No.48686: SCHMIDT Friedrich, von Weidebach aus dem Römischen Reich [unbestimmt], reg. Wien 16.05.1766, ins Banat WK 65/52 = BanA Fasz 35, rNr 148 fol 457b = Abs Bd. II S.55
WILHELM and KALLBRUNNER (WK) did not find an appropriate place of origin "Weidebach" and made only the remark "unbestimmt" (undetermined). Friedrich SCHMIDT was registered together with two others from the same "Weidebach": WK 65/50-52: Peter MILLER, Johannes ENDER, Fridrich SCHMID Maybe this could help, if you know the other persons. There is a "Weidenbach" (Oberkirch) north-east of Offenburg, Baden.
Philipp
Von: "Erin Kampf" <erin.kampf@...> An: "everybody@banat.groups.io" <everybody@banat.groups.io>
@Anni - Yes, it certainly could be. Very difficult for me to decipher. Do you know what it says after his name and before "et Barbara uxor"? @David - Thanks for the map. Very interesting. I have not seen that before. I must come by my love of wine honestly - so many vineyards ;)
|
|
Erin Kampf
Thank you, Philipp!!! This is so helpful. I really appreciate it.
|
|